Even during World War II, a war that exceeded WWI in savagery, chemical agents were not employed by any of the sides
There was, of course, a simple reason for this having nothing to do with the advance of civilization or humanity. Owing to its modes of transmission, wind, ground-water and so on, releases of clouds of toxic chemicals could just as well injure the army that did it, as the enemy forces it wished to destroy. The slightest caprice of the weather could, and did, waft phosgene gas back into one's own trenches often enough to render its employment self-destructive and self-defeating.
This being the case, it with considerable astonishment that we are reading articles every day in the newspapers, about the developing anthrax menace. Yet it appears that no-one ,editors, reporters, columnists or letter writers, are raising the obvious questions that anyone who has not be bought, brain-washed, or intimidated into silence, would be asking himself:
We feel that we have answers to at least some of these questions:
In fact, so many aspects of the media-hyped "anthrax panic" are so favorable to governmental and military objectives, that we are certain there are persons in Washington today who are wondering why nobody ever thought it doing something like this before:
In the 1960's the CIA experimented with LSD by organizing parties at which the potent hallucinogen was dropped into cocktails. (Reference: Jack Macintosh: Search for the Manchurian Candidate)
In the 1940's the federal government callously supported research on the effects of radioactive substances, including plutonium, that were fed to or injected in hospital patients around the country without their knowledge, permission or consent, informed or otherwise . (Reference: The Plutonium Files; Eileen Wellsome)
Because such things have happened in the past, we do not consider these suggestions as manifestations of paranoia or conspiracy-ranting. Rather we consider them logical projections of customary behavior of our government over the last 200 years.
Recall that the first mass inoculation in history was ordered by George Washington. He had the entire Continental Army inoculated long before vaccination was developed by Jenner, and at a time when the more primitive cow-pox inoculation was known to produce fatalities in 1 out of 3 cases.
Recall also that it was the European settlers in colonies around the world, who were the pioneers in biological warfare when they sold or gave blankets known to be infected with small-pox, to native peoples .
It was by these means, for example, that the town of Amherst ,Massachusetts, proud home to 5 universities, was cleared for civilization by Lord Jeffreys.
No. America is not responsible for all the evils that afflict the world. Yes, if there is some evil institution or methodology, the United States, along with most other nations, has maintained or promoted it at one time or another.